Great censorship, Microsoft
-
I was reading on Windows
EmbeddedIoT and came across their example screenshots for the install process:
SourceIs it just me, or are the censor-blurred sections completely readable?
-
I think the intention is to show that it may be different for your particular case. But I'm not really sure why that's even necessary at all.
-
@LB_ said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
I think the intention is to show that it may be different for your particular case. But I'm not really sure why that's even necessary at all.
Considering Win10 insider build 14366 just came out today...
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
Is it just me, or are the censor-blurred sections completely readable?
If you squint.
-
Hmm.... 10 IoT
....
10IoT
...
idiot
...
yup. I was right.
-
@Lorne-Kates said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
Is it just me, or are the censor-blurred sections completely readable?
If you squint.
I never understood this. How does reducing the amount of input improve clarity?
-
@Tsaukpaetra Stochastic resonance is a weird thing, but works.
-
@dkf said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
@Tsaukpaetra Stochastic resonance is a weird thing, but works.
Floating boats and all that. Also, the opposite of what I was saying, if I'm reading it right.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
@Lorne-Kates said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
Is it just me, or are the censor-blurred sections completely readable?
If you squint.
I never understood this. How does reducing the amount of input improve clarity?
Smaller aperture increases depth of field. There are, of course, limits and counfounders to the benefit of the effect, but it comes down to looking through a smaller pinhole increases sharpness at the expense of brightness. It does this by increasing collimation by filtering out light rays outside some collimation boundary, with a smaller aperture having stronger filtering.
-
@Tsaukpaetra you're able to filter out irrelevant small scale patterns and instead see large scale ones?
-
@bb36e said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
@Tsaukpaetra you're able to filter out irrelevant small scale patterns and instead see large scale ones?
Isn't that the point of more data?
@Dreikin said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
@Lorne-Kates said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Great censorship, Microsoft:
Is it just me, or are the censor-blurred sections completely readable?
If you squint.
I never understood this. How does reducing the amount of input improve clarity?
Smaller aperture increases depth of field. There are, of course, limits and counfounders to the benefit of the effect, but it comes down to looking through a smaller pinhole increases sharpness at the expense of brightness. It does this by increasing collimation by filtering out light rays outside some collimation boundary, with a smaller aperture having stronger filtering.
Now that's a good example!