Mashup Challenge $100,000 prize - WTF if Spectate Swamp wins?
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
SSDS is just that important.
Thread locked as part of the conspiracy to hold SSDS back from the rest of the world.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Just as I thought. A dead end site with a bunch of Bots to distract me. SSDS is just that important. They want to keep it quiet. 2100 replies here and 2511 on the other post. This is not human.
You should probably submit us for the Loebner prize, you'd make quite a bit of money...
-
-
yeah right
-
-
-
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
Nope. Thread locked.
SpectateSwamp: Clearly MPS is trying to stop you from reaching the masses by constantly locking your thread - this provides you with a great opportunity to curse him.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Anyway this latest video is of a bright and shiny that goes behind a cloud. My cloud guy from another forum will check it out more closely. CloudySwamp.
So, I go away for a few weeks, and I get replaced... I wonder if I should be insulted?
-
@WeatherGod said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
Anyway this latest video is of a bright and shiny that goes behind a cloud. My cloud guy from another forum will check it out more closely. CloudySwamp.
So, I go away for a few weeks, and I get replaced... I wonder if I should be insulted?
Probably not. His cloud guy is actually just himself in the mirror.
-
So you think we're all bots? How do you explain bots which can actually carry on intelligent conversations and even put together a website? Out of all of us, you're the most likely to be a neural network based on the way you
talkbabble incoherently.EDIT: Nevermind, I forgot to read the last page before posting...stupid me.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Just as I thought. A dead end site with a bunch of Bots to distract me. SSDS is just that important.
No, we're not bots. We're just regular intelligent people who have systematically and utterly destroyed every single "point" you've tried to make. You have never once said something, done something, or even seen something, that hasn't been proven to be crap.
Of course, since this contradicts your world view, you take refuge in writing us off as bots, and thereby continue your self-delusions.
So by all means, please, write us off. Go back to your bongs, your bad videos, your bad images, and your "alien" digital artifacts, and enjoy your pathetic little corner of existence. We'll be sure to send the alien overlords over to give you a thorough probing once they're done disguising themselves as airplanes, insects, and leaves.
-
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Just as I thought. A dead end site with a bunch of Bots to distract me. SSDS is just that important. They want to keep it quiet. 2100 replies here and 2511 on the other post. This is not human.
ASSIMILATE!
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Just as I thought. A dead end site with a bunch of Bots to distract me. SSDS is just that important. They want to keep it quiet.
Who is this "they" of which you speak?
By the way, would it actually be POSSIBLE to write a bot to argue with him? If I were a bot and I had to refute Swampy, I'd sudo cat /dev/null > /dev/hda (or whatever the equiv command is).
-
@elgate said:
If I were a bot and I had to refute Swampy, I'd sudo cat /dev/null > /dev/hda (or whatever the equiv command is).
I don't think a bot can do that, it is limited to speech I believe. I could imagine a dialog between Swampy and a bot looked quite similar to a dialog between two bots.
"Hello."
"Hi. How are you?"
"Hello. I am fine, and so is the WhiteCrow in my BackYard."
"Hello! Nice to meet you. Is it fun to be fine, and so is the WhiteCrow in my BackYard.?"
"Hi. :). I don't know if it is fun to be fine, and so is the WhiteCrow in my BackYard.?."
I'ld love to see Eliza fix SpectateSwamps psychosis.
-
@derula said:
I'ld love to see Eliza fix SpectateSwamps psychosis.
But Swampy'd make Eliza have a nervous breakdown. Remember, he doesn't type words. He uses his custom 0-bit character + search 'n replace for everything:
Eliza: Hello, how are you?
Swampy: jjjjjjjjjjj
Eliza: Hello, jjjjjjjjjjj. Isn't it a nice day today?
Swampy: jjjj
Eliza: Why do you say that?
Swampy: jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Eliza: Tell me more!
Swampy: j
Eliza: [core dump]
-
@MarcB said:
But Swampy'd make Eliza have a nervous breakdown.
Yeah. Well. That would still be fun to watch. Swampy should start a. ElizaServer TakeDown. Chatting with every ELiZa he can find and Jam It! BoonDoggle. That would finally be proof. SSDS doesn't only make. As we already know. Windows and any client software obsolete. It even works on SerVers. Like as ChatBot SerVers. Gee-haw!*
- (yeah, I know it has officially changed to jee-haw, but as I'm a little conservative and want to honor the stupidities that have been performed by the <url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurter_Allgemeine_Zeitung">FAZ, I'll stick to the old-fashioned orthography.)
-
(In reply to the post that is above this one only if you're using flat list sorted ascending)
That made me laugh for five minutes straight. Much more the*n a Genuine Spectate Swamp Post.
*Intentional.
-
I think Eliza shows considerably more intelligence than Mr Swamp.
-
@elgate said:
I think Eliza shows considerably more intelligence than Mr Swamp.
Yeah, at least the sentences are more coherent.
-
@HannahRochelle said:
@elgate said:
I think Eliza shows considerably more intelligence than Mr Swamp.
Yeah, at least the sentences are more coherent.I couldn't confuse Eliza.
You: Am I turning you on?
Eliza: Would you want to be turning i on?You: What are you doing tonight?
Eliza: Does that question interest you?So I moved on to more interesting bots.
<font face="Arial" size="2"> Human: Jam it!
ALICE:"it" being Geehaw boondoggle?
Human: Data processing data data processing.
ALICE: Commander Data is a real inspiration.
Human: Get the SSDS and Jam It!
ALICE: Where can I get the SSDS and Jam It?
Human: Funny coinci-dance.
ALICE: I am so glad you find this amusing, Elgate. </font><font face="Arial" size="2"> Human: Will you marry me?
ALICE: Why don't you just download me?
Human: So are you saying I can have the milk for free?
ALICE: It's all good. Yes, that's what I mean, isn't it clear? </font>So far, a coherent response to everything I've said. Bots 4, Swamp 0.
-
@elgate said:
I couldn't confuse Eliza.
[Simulated Swamp<->Bot dialog]Great! Ooh ooh ooh, can't wait to see a real Swamp<->Bot-log! Where is Mr. Swamp, by the way?
-
tl;dnr
whats this thread about?
-
@jimo_hh said:
whats this thread about?
I think you got lost at that last turn. Just go back the way you came, but instead of turning left this time, turn right. Of course, if you're still going in the opposite direction, you'd want to turn left as the directions would be reversed. And, if you haven't gotten back on the main road, you'd just go directly across the intersection instead. Got it?
-
@jimo_hh said:
tl;dnr
whats this thread about?
Wow, is this like web 3.0 where you just go through every thread and ask people to get back to you with a summary?
That is brilliant!
-
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
you just go through every thread and ask people to get back to you with a summary
Cliff Notes™ for Forums.
-
@jimo_hh said:
tl;dnr
whats this thread about?
This thread is mostly about you going away and never returning. It's up to you to make it so!
Also, In the future, be advised that "tl;dnr" means "too long; did not read". What you want to use is "ts;cnr" or "[I'm] too stupid; could not read". This should serve you well on the next forum where you post crap that just wastes everyone's time.
-
@bstorer said:
This thread is mostly about you going away and never returning. It's up to you to make it so!
Also, In the future, be advised that "tl;dnr" means "too long; did not read". What you want to use is "ts;cnr" or "[I'm] too stupid; could not read". This should serve you well on the next forum where you post crap that just wastes everyone's time.
*Golf clap*
-
@jimo_hh said:
tl;dnr
whats this thread about?
Wow, one whole post!
*lumps him in the same category as Spectate*
-
@HannahRochelle said:
lumps him in the same category as Spectate
No way. His post contained a complete and correct sentence (if you disregard usage of apostrophies and capital letters), which even had a question mark. That's a 100% more correct and complete sentences then Spectate, and 200% in good usage of question marks (100% because SS doesn't use question marks on questions, and another 100% because SS uses quotes after other sentences).
-
@derula said:
@HannahRochelle said:
*lumps him in the same category as Spectate*
No way. His post contained a complete and correct sentence (if you disregard usage of apostrophies and capital letters), which even had a question mark. That's a 100% more correct and complete sentences then Spectate, and 200% in good usage of question marks (100% because SS doesn't use question marks on questions, and another 100% because SS uses quotes after other sentences).
This is true. But what the hell kind of moron expects someone to explain an entire thread to them, just because they're too lazy to read it?
-
Sorry I lost track a while ago... Can anyone sum up the last 500 posts in a "marker" post. We need these here and there to keep people on track.
Did SS fix the SSDS bug that the software starts?
Did SS figure out that crappy camera software does not mean that aliens are everywhere?
Has SS figured out 3D space and the laws of physics?
-
@HannahRochelle said:
But what the hell kind of moron expects someone to explain an entire thread to them, just because they're too lazy to read it?
@dlikhten said:
Sorry I lost track a while ago... Can anyone sum up the last 500 posts in a "marker" post. We need these here and there to keep people on track.
Did SS fix the SSDS bug that the software starts?
Did SS figure out that crappy camera software does not mean that aliens are everywhere?
Has SS figured out 3D space and the laws of physics?
^ This kind.
-
In summary @dlikhten said:
Did SS fix the SSDS bug that the software starts?
No.@dlikhten said:Did SS figure out that crappy camera software does not mean that aliens are everywhere?
No.@dlikhten said:Has SS figured out 3D space and the laws of physics?
No.
-
@dlikhten said:
Did SS fix?
@dlikhten said:Did SS figure?
C'mon, you should know the answer from those words alone!
-
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
Dude, this thread has over 2000 posts. If you don't keep up for 2 days you are WAAAAY behind and need alot of time to catch up. Most of it is just flameage. I think the two posts afterwards summed it up pretty damn well.
-
@dlikhten said:
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
Dude, this thread has over 2000 posts. If you don't keep up for 2 days you are WAAAAY behind and need alot of time to catch up. Most of it is just flameage. I think the two posts afterwards summed it up pretty damn well.
Either read it or don't. Asking people to summarize things because you are too lazy to read a forum thread is rather ridiculous.
Especially since your questions had obvious answers....
-
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
Either read it or don't.
OR export it to a text file and search it locally using SSDS. <font size=3>HAVE WE LEARNED NOTHING, PEOPLE???</font>
-
@rc_pinchey said:
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
Either read it or don't.
OR export it to a text file and search it locally using SSDS. <font size="3">HAVE WE LEARNED NOTHING, PEOPLE???</font>SS has been working hard to solve this BUG so it might not be possible soon.
-
@dlikhten said:
SS has been working hard to solve this BUG so it might not be possible soon.
You really are proud of that aren't you?
It wasn't funny the first 10 times you posted it, and it really hasn't gotten any funnier.
-
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@dlikhten said:
SS has been working hard to solve this BUG so it might not be possible soon.
You really are proud of that aren't you?
It wasn't funny the first 10 times you posted it, and it really hasn't gotten any funnier.
Yea... Its an open source project, we should be helping him resolve the bugs... Ah whatever Ill drop it forever.
-
@dlikhten said:
we should be helping him resolve the bugs
It might have been funny if Spectate was someone who would listen, or care, or be offended.
I think he has proved himself oblivious.
-
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@dlikhten said:
we should be helping him resolve the bugs
It might have been funny if Spectate was someone who would listen, or care, or be offended.
I think he has proved himself oblivious.
Your logic is solid! There is no disputing this fact. SS does not get offended/care about anything we say. I should have been wiser!
Forgive me master!
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Just as I thought. A dead end site with a bunch of Bots to distract me. SSDS is just that important. They want to keep it quiet. 2100 replies here and 2511 on the other post. This is not human.
Sorry I looked back to see more quotes from SS
SS just does not get it. The world is wrong and he is right.
Also were all bots. Hey, how can you tell were not all just some elaborate government scheme to trick SS to reveal his alien/SSDS secrets to a forum who he THINKS is full of developers who know what they are talking about who can help justify his point about how great he really is. You cant! HAHA Were all government aliens. Do you think humans work in the government? Think again!
-
@dlikhten said:
SS just does not get it. The world is wrong and he is right.
TRWTF is you are just now understanding this.
I may end up making you the focus of TSMoE instead of Spectate.
-
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@dlikhten said:
SS just does not get it. The world is wrong and he is right.
TRWTF is you are just now understanding this.
I may end up making you the focus of TSMoE instead of Spectate.
No, I was pretty sure of this from day one. I guess I am just stating the obvious.
-
-
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@dlikhten said:
I guess I am just stating the obvious.
Recursively.
ACK my head!
Shit. How do I get to that return statement?
SS thinks the world is wrong.
SHIT wrong flag!
-
I wonder what SpectateSwamp is doing right now.
-
@tombom said:
I wonder what SpectateSwamp is doing right now.
...
Is it just me, or is anyone else fighting the urge to say something reeeeally childish right about now?
