Mashup Challenge $100,000 prize - WTF if Spectate Swamp wins?
-
I thiunk the site needs some SpectateSwamp Haiku - how about these two:
Filming some insects
Thinking they are alien
This is how he thinks
<o:p></o:p>
Doug does Desktop Search
Code noodles in old VB
Hit Enter! Jam it!
-
@WWWWolf said:
Had you written the thing properly, it would have been easier to port to VB.NET; had it been ported to VB.NET, you might have gotten some support from open source developers
What kind of idiot would port that thing to VB.Net?!
-
Someone did in the old thread. Wish I could remember who.
-
@bstorer said:
@WWWWolf said:
Had you written the thing properly, it would have been easier to port to VB.NET; had it been ported to VB.NET, you might have gotten some support from open source developers
What kind of idiot would port that thing to VB.Net?!Isn't that currently in development with CodeSimian?
I agree it is crazy though.
-
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@bstorer said:
@WWWWolf said:
Had you written the thing properly, it would have been easier to port to VB.NET; had it been ported to VB.NET, you might have gotten some support from open source developers
What kind of idiot would port that thing to VB.Net?!Isn't that currently in development with CodeSimian?
I agree it is crazy though.
@elgate said:
Someone did in the old thread. Wish I could remember who.
Okay, guys, I'll take the bait...sigh. This is obviously a sign that I am posting way too much on Swampy's threads....
http://forums.thedailywtf.com/forums/p/8159/159018.aspx#159018
@bstorer said:
Shouldn't be a problem. I'm actually focusing on something else at the moment. I hate to promise too much too soon, but how about SSDS ported to VB.net, with the full project files? And how about an (incredibly massive) deconstruction of the code itself: the way it works, what it does wrong, algorithmic analysis, etc.?
(That was only 4 days ago....) It is funny how Swampy is actually getting pretty much everything he wanted out of this group: attention, publicity and coding effort.
-
Take a deep breath, and let it out slowly, now realize everything you were thinking is wrong...
Think about it guys... THINK...you are discussingporting a BAD VB application to VB.NET. Furthermore it is pretty well known that GREP (ported to Windows from linux binaries, see UnixUtils an old windows project) already does the same job as SSDS. If you want to implement SSDS correctly, program a front-end to grep and have it work on a single file. This will solve all of SSDS' bugs instantly because grep not working is a hardware failure at this point. Once we have a front-ended grep, we can add w/e commands SS came up with to it later as "features". Best part is you can write this in any language granted that you can execute grep... Hell you can even do one better, just use the language's internal regex... say... java regex, or ruby regex, you won't even have to do much work after that...
For extra points just create a script called ssds.cmd which will be compatible with DOS (latest one available) and when executed it will print one line: Do not use this script under any circumstance. Please rethink what you want to do and then get the appropriate program for it.
-
@dlikhten said:
Think about it guys... THINK...you are discussingporting a BAD VB application to VB.NET. Furthermore it is pretty well known that GREP (ported to Windows from linux binaries, see UnixUtils an old windows project) already does the same job as SSDS. If you want to implement SSDS correctly, program a front-end to grep and have it work on a single file.
I don't want to implement it correctly. I want to maintain all the hideously poor design of the original, but in a language people may actually have compilers for. The correct way to implement SSDS is to download GDS and forget this piece of crap ever existed.
-
@bstorer said:
I don't want to implement it correctly. I want to maintain all the hideously poor design of the original, but in a language people may actually have compilers for.
Right about now, Spectate is weeping uncontrollable tears of joy.
-
@CodeSimian said:
Good. Now he'll have one less excuse when nobody wants to use it.@bstorer said:
I don't want to implement it correctly. I want to maintain all the hideously poor design of the original, but in a language people may actually have compilers for.
Right about now, Spectate is weeping uncontrollable tears of joy.
-
@bstorer said:
Good. Now he'll have one less excuse when nobody wants to use it.
Yeah, but he is a bit like a doomsday cult leader. When their prophesied date for the end of the world comes and goes uneventfully, you think they change their belief system? Nope. They have invested far too much personally, so they simply rationalize the continued existence of the world by saying "Well, looks like we saved the world after all. Good job, people. Too bad those clueless fools in the media will never give us the credit."
In fact, Spectate is exactly like a doomsday cult leader, except he has no followers but the imaginary Swampies in his head. I'm sure in 2012 he will be bragging about how he saved us all from certain destruction.
Sure, you will deliver a working VB .NET port and Spectate will be ecstatic. When nobody uses the new version, he will ask for a "skin". When somebody delivers a "skin" and SSDS doesn't catch on, he will try to ramp up the "marketing" (random spamming). When that doesn't work, he will blame it on "conspiracies" and "forum plants".
Obviously we would all like to break down Swampy's kryptonite wall of insanity and willful blindness, but I don't think it's ever gonna happen.
(Oh, why can't I stop posting in this thread?)
-
@CodeSimian said:
Sure, you will deliver a working VB .NET port and Spectate will be ecstatic.
Maybe if he becomes happy enough he'll have a heart attack?
@CodeSimian said:(Oh, why can't I stop posting in this thread?)
It's like a train wreck.
@CodeSimian said:Obviously we would all like to break down Swampy's kryptonite wall of insanity and willful blindness, but I don't think it's ever gonna happen.
Why would you want to? Lex Luthor was poisoned due to excessive exposure to kryptonite, so hopefully Doug will succumb to it's radiation, however unlike Lex he doesn't have the income to make that snazzy vest thing that keeps him not dead.
-
@CodeSimian said:
Obviously we would all like to break down Swampy's kryptonite wall of insanity and willful blindness, but I don't think it's ever gonna happen.
Believe me, I'm not foolish enough to think I can teach Swampy anything. I really don't know why I'm doing it, other than I'm really curious as to just how fragmented his logic is. Although the thought of handing over an updated port of his program that he can't understand does amuse me.
-
@bstorer said:
Although the thought of handing over an updated port of his program that he can't understand does amuse me.
Yeah, that is pretty amusing. Too bad Swampy evidently lives by the credo that the key to success is to understand nothing. (It's like Zen Buddhism for morons!)
-
@Lingerance said:
Why would you want to? Lex Luthor was poisoned due to excessive exposure to kryptonite, so hopefully Doug will succumb to it's radiation, however unlike Lex he doesn't have the income to make that snazzy vest thing that keeps him not dead.
Post-Crisis Luthor became President of the United States -- I'd hate to see that happen to Swampy.
-
This thread ...
This thread is still going?
-
@bstorer said:
@dlikhten said:
Think about it guys... THINK...you are discussingporting a BAD VB application to VB.NET. Furthermore it is pretty well known that GREP (ported to Windows from linux binaries, see UnixUtils an old windows project) already does the same job as SSDS. If you want to implement SSDS correctly, program a front-end to grep and have it work on a single file.
I don't want to implement it correctly. I want to maintain all the hideously poor design of the original, but in a language people may actually have compilers for. The correct way to implement SSDS is to download GDS and forget this piece of crap ever existed.Dude, WTF? Why would you spend your time implementing a POS so that anyone can compile it? It should be posted in its unedited entirety all in one page at once with a small dot saying "you are here" with a side-by-side commentary from us about what each line does and how it can be done better. It will be required reading in colleges as to "how to NOT write your programs". After the students bang out their brains trying to understand it there will be a comment "now that you understand it, realize that this program is 100% useless because during design time the author refused to look up how regular expressions work or the concepts of indexing."
Unfortunately the above solution will also have the bug of being an effective torturing device and stealing the recepient's soul. It may wind up being banned in the USA due to the "cruel and unusual punishment" clause in that thing called the constitution.
-
@medialint said:
This thread is still going?
And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going...
-
@bstorer said:
@CodeSimian said:
Obviously we would all like to break down Swampy's kryptonite wall of insanity and willful blindness, but I don't think it's ever gonna happen.
Believe me, I'm not foolish enough to think I can teach Swampy anything. I really don't know why I'm doing it, other than I'm really curious as to just how fragmented his logic is. Although the thought of handing over an updated port of his program that he can't understand does amuse me.maybe the whole community could trhow in a hand and make different pieces of the new SSDS?
IMO we should all ignore the current source for ssds and try to reverse engineer the original SSDS and create some freaky monster, optionally even better that the last omg winner, so then swampy could "learn" .net from looking at it, tho delivering something that actually works fine could be fun too.
@dlikhten said:
Unfortunately the above solution will also have the bug of being an effective torturing device and stealing the recepient's soul. It may wind up being banned in the USA due to the "cruel and unusual punishment" clause in that thing called the constitution.
I thought that was the real reason for this thing to even exist, oh well..
-
@dlikhten said:
Dude, WTF? Why would you spend your time implementing a POS so that anyone can compile it?
Maybe it's like how the Allies distributed Nazi propaganda during WWII just to show how crazy Hitler really was?
Am I the first Godwin?
-
@morbiuswilters said:
Am I the first Godwin?
In this particular thread, I believe you are. In the general realm of Swampiness, you're not the first...
@ZippoLag said:
IMO we should all ignore the current source for ssds and try to reverse engineer the original SSDS and create some freaky monster, optionally even better that the last omg winner
I think you're onto something...maybe Desktop Search could be the next OMGWTF contest, and SSDS could be an optional framework that you could start with.
@bstorer said:
Although the thought of handing over an updated port of his program that he can't understand does amuse me.
I'm hoping that we can give him a link to VB.NET Express, the new source code (in a .txt, of course), and a video on how to set up a project. Then, we tell him to add some noodles and Jam It. I think he might surprise us and actually be able to use it.
Then again, I'm probably just dreaming...
-
No quitters here
@dlikhten said:
I'll have to dig up more old media. Search out local legend or capture fresh Aliens on video. Things are going good with work on a VB.net version. Once you get the first copy running. You are hooked. Bash it through the various tests. fixing and patching as you go. Wow I'm jealous.. I need a copy of VB.net just to see if I can get it to work there. Then a C version, Java maybe.@medialint said:
This thread is still going?
And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going... And going...
Having this VB5 version around to compare the net version against will be handy. Like what if you build it and dumb dumb old SpectatSwamps version is way faster. Then what?
Soon the swampies will be in control of this thread. The fixes and features they add to SSDS will be spectacular. Once they get the hang of capturing Aliens on video. Then we'll see entertainment
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Having this VB5 version around to compare the net version against will be handy. Like what if you build it and dumb dumb old SpectatSwamps version is way faster. Then what?
The two versions will be almost exactly the same. They'll use the same stupid logic, the same crappy old-school VB error handling, the same bad algorithms. The only major differences between the two are- All the GoSub labels are now separate procedures
- I have to implement a system to emulate the VB5/6 form painting in GDI.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
I'll have to dig up more old media. Search out local legend or capture fresh Aliens on video.
Please don't.@SpectateSwamp said:
Things are going good with work on a VB.net version. Once you get the first copy running.
I think (really hope actually) that the .Net version is a bit of a joke - just an attempt to show how poor your application really is.@SpectateSwamp said:
You are hooked. Bash it through the various tests. fixing and patching as you go.
Hooked - I doubt it. What 'various tests'? I thought testing was part of a normal development cycle and therefore something you would be against.@SpectateSwamp said:
I need a copy of VB.net just to see if I can get it to work there.
I pity anyone trying to port that mess - would it have really hurt you to use fuctions / subs instead of gosub and return?@SpectateSwamp said:
The fixes and features they add to SSDS will be spectacular.
No - people will laugh at it and that will be all. I doubt there will be any serious attempt to improve it...
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Soon the swampies will be in control of this thread. The fixes and features they add to SSDS will be spectacular. Once they get the hang of capturing Aliens on video. Then we'll see entertainment
Who are the swampies? I want a list! So far not one person supported you. We only want to work on your software caz its a joke, or something retarded, or an example of how not to write code for the future programmers.
I DEMAND A LIST OF SWAMPIES SO EVERYONE ON IT CAN SAY "WTF? IM NOT A SWAMPIE!"
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Like what if you build it and dumb dumb old SpectatSwamps version is way faster.
Are you really having this much trouble spelling your own name? I know it can't be a typo, since you keep bragging about your amazing typing skills.
Do you have this much trouble spelling your real-life name? "Let's see... I have to fill out this government form. The first field is "name". Name?! What a stupid question! My name is Doug Pederson...How do you spell that again? D-O-O-G P-E-E-D-U-R-S-U-N???"
@SpectateSwamp said:
Soon the swampies will be in control of this thread. The fixes and features they add to SSDS will be spectacular. Once they get the hang of capturing Aliens on video. Then we'll see entertainment
I hate you so much.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
The fixes and features they add to SSDS will be spectacular.
Heres a major fix to ALL problems of SSDS: Don't use SSDS, the fact that it starts up is itself a bug. Please fix that SS, make sure that software can't start so that the bug will be closed. I will be adding it to your sourceforge.
Here is the bug
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
I need a copy of VB.net just to see if I can get it to work there.
Spectate: You can get Visual Basic .NET 2008 Express for free from Microsoft. I suggest you install it and then jam it.
-
@dlikhten said:
Actually doing anything with sourceforge is far too much effort for him, he couldn't even be arsed posting his code there never mind reading any of the bug reports.Heres a major fix to ALL problems of SSDS: Don't use SSDS, the fact that it starts up is itself a bug. Please fix that SS, make sure that software can't start so that the bug will be closed. I will be adding it to your sourceforge.
Here is the bug
-
@spenk said:
@dlikhten said:
Actually doing anything with sourceforge is far too much effort for him, he couldn't even be arsed posting his code there never mind reading any of the bug reports.Heres a major fix to ALL problems of SSDS: Don't use SSDS, the fact that it starts up is itself a bug. Please fix that SS, make sure that software can't start so that the bug will be closed. I will be adding it to your sourceforge.
Here is the bug
I know, I just thought that this is the most awsome bug I've ever submitted!
-
@dlikhten said:
I know, I just thought that this is the most awsome bug I've ever submitted!
To be fair to swampie he nearly nailed this bug - it doesn't start up properly on a first run, you need to persevere and attempt a second run before it actually 'works'.Gee Haw and Jam It.
-
@CodeSimian said:
How do you spell that again? D-O-O-G P-E-E-D-U-R-S-U-N???
M-O-O-N, that spells Doug Pederson!
-
@spenk said:
@dlikhten said:
I know, I just thought that this is the most awsome bug I've ever submitted!
To be fair to swampie he nearly nailed this bug - it doesn't start up properly on a first run, you need to persevere and attempt a second run before it actually 'works'.Gee Haw and Jam It.
Good attempt... Well its ok with a little bit of QA we can help Doug on his endevours finding a way to fix this evil bug...
-
Funny, usually measuring the momentum of a particle will alter it. But this thread has become dedicated to studying and observing the phenomenon of SpectateSwamp and it has not changed him at all. While we're occupied with finding and discussing SwampQuotes and such, he keeps chugging along obliviously as if we were just smiling and nodding. Perhaps the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle doesn't apply to SpectateSwamp? I'm not sure whether that is due to the stones, the aliens, SSDS, or that he's simply incapable of changing to a different quantum state. Perhaps there will be custard pie available?
-
Correct. We are apparently his "swampies" who are advocating his word to all. He is retarded and dillusional.
-
@Eternal Density said:
Funny, usually measuring the momentum of a particle will alter it. But this thread has become dedicated to studying and observing the phenomenon of SpectateSwamp and it has not changed him at all.
Unfortunately, Swampie is a great mass of particles. We'll have to set up a zillion sensors to measure each one individually - maybe he'll fly apart at that point and become one with the universe.
... of course, that'd mean we'd probably be inhaling swampbits in short order. probably not a good thing... all those 'shrooms/acid/weed he's been doing over the years have saturated him down to the quantum level.
-
@aleph said:
I think you're onto something...maybe Desktop Search could be the next OMGWTF contest, and SSDS could be an optional framework that you could start with.
No, OMGWTF's have to be far simpler, but since SSDS is the ONLY PROGRAM YOU WILL EVER NEED, it should be able to fulfill any OMGWTF contest requirement.
Eample - SwampCalc:
1. Use SSDS to put math problem in a text file and launch it in Notepad.
2. Use Notepad to print the file.
3. Mail printout to 9th grader, wait for reply.
4. Video in reply.
5. Index the video and set it to pause on the part with the best view of the answer. (Be careful not to use start/wait where staart/waait are required!)
6. Screenshot each frame and circle any suspicious specks.
7. Have SSDS flash each of those pics on the screen for 1/10 second while videoing in the result with a DVD camcorder.
8. Watch the resulting DVD, note the answer to the math problem.
9. Upload the video and spam it on forums.thedailywtf.com as evidence of aliens.Perhaps a simple random number generator? (obviously consisting of a text file with thousands of lines consisting of "num: " followed by some number, then using SSDS to search for "num: " and flash random matches, with the highlight color set to the background color so as to hide the "num: " tag)
-
@joemck said:
(Be careful not to use start/wait where staart/waait are required!)
Sorry to be pedantic, but "staart" and "waait" are not really commands. They are just Swampy's way of "commenting out" options he doesn't want to use at the moment. "staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart" and "waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaait" would work equally well.
-
Sounds like a good plan to me, provided that the following
@joemck said:
2. Use Notepad to print the file.
is done using SendKeys() from within SSDS. Option caLc! at prompt #4 should do it.
-
@aleph said:
is done using SendKeys() from within SSDS. Option caLc! at prompt #4 should do it.
Please think about what you are saying - caLc! is far too difficult to remember and requires you to move your finger while typing, obviously the calc option will be llll anything else is just confusing. Jam It.
-
@joemck said:
SwampCalc...
Oh man best program EVER. The swamp calc will solve desktop calculation problems all over the world. Why go though the complex methods of opening calc typing in the problem and hitting enter? This is so much simpler, all you need to do is have the fax and printer and scanner next to you and the swampcalc program and poof, instant aliens and a calculator at once! woo!
-
So here I am trying to answer someone's serious question about a real known bug and I go to google and search and where do I end up?
-
@Eternal Density said:
Funny, usually measuring the momentum of a particle will alter it. But this thread has become dedicated to studying and observing the phenomenon of SpectateSwamp and it has not changed him at all. While we're occupied with finding and discussing SwampQuotes and such, he keeps chugging along obliviously as if we were just smiling and nodding. Perhaps the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle doesn't apply to SpectateSwamp?
Actually, "SpectateSwamp" is a pretty useless definition of an observable. For the Uncertainty Principle to work, we need two non-commutating observables, otherwise we will measure the same things over and over again.
I do think his literacy is changing every now and then, so if we could establish that "SpectateSwamp's literacy" and "SpectateSwamp's lunacy" do not commutate, we could try to change his lunacy by looking at his literacy.
But even then I guess the lunacy part of his wavefunction looks like 0.9999|nutjob> + 0.00009|crazy> + 0.00001|normal>.
-
@dlikhten said:
Oh man best program EVER. The swamp calc will solve desktop calculation problems all over the world. Why go though the complex methods of opening calc typing in the problem and hitting enter? This is so much simpler, all you need to do is have the fax and printer and scanner next to you and the swampcalc program and poof, instant aliens and a calculator at once! woo!
As long as it uses. GOTOs and no functions. Its gotta be simple. Enough for the stups to make changes and jam it. Then the Geeks loose control.
Teach math? Do operations. Print Screen. Flip through pages on wood table. With Video. Use SSDS to teach Math. Jam it to 9th grade.
-
@BeenThere said:
As long as it uses. GOTOs and no functions. Its gotta be simple.
Simple? How about Swampie videos in whatever math problem he needs solved, posts it to (Youtube|Google|archive.org), and waits for the answer to be posted in the comments. It's rather like XKCD's O(1) solution to the Travelling Salesman problem, or Linus Torvald's backups... why do the work yourself when you can get someone else to do it for you?
It's becoming obvious that Swampie doesn't really see aliens in his videos. He just sees specks and can't afford spectacles to view his monitor properly (or ruined his eyes look at his 200th generation ultraslowmo-recap videos), so he's uploading all the potentials and letting us do the work for him.
-
sorry ive been gone so long [FUCKING gcse-s (no i havent been fucking exams, im just annoyed at having to work)], and i finally worked up enough courage to think about swamp's teachings again. apologies again for the wait, just tack this on the end:
Suffering from suspected psychoses too numerous to name, SpectateSwamp has the obsession that the entire world is out to get him. 'Geeks' are conspiring to suppress his 'search engine' and make him lose coding competitions, and many even challenge his magic stones! It is really impossible to do justice in summary to the wide, scary range of Doug's paranoia, so for a more detailed analysis of his conspiracy theories, visit the 'Conspiracies' page.
As well as his digital obsessions, Doug is an avid amateur paleontologist who combes the riverbanks near his home in an attempt to find fossils. An interesting endeavour which many of us have tried at some point, but Spectate takes it one step further. Not content with the skeletons of dead fish, he honestly believes that he found some real life dinosaur skin. Apparantly ignorant of the fact that this is impossible except in marshes and tar pits, Doug 'strengthened' his claims with many blurry photos which to most looked like nothing more than a rock. As may well be expected, he ignored all criticisms against him, claiming conspiracies by local museums who, the thought, wanted to poach his finds. Most critics believe they would not want to poach it at all - if the museum wanted a bit of useless and uninteresting rock, they could go and find one themselves - as Spectate himself did. Apparantly historical delusions are somewhat a problem in Doug's neighbourhood, as one of Spectate's 'friends' believes he found a huge skeleton at the river. Frighteningly, this unnamed friend also believed in a conspiracy against him, and, like Doug, was totally unable to take a photograph that was in focus, even with today's digital camera technology. If you want more detail, please see the 'Dinosaur Skin' section.
Clearly discontented with his earthly conspiracies, Spectate sought to branch out and soon came across what he thought were aliens in some of his pointless videos of clouds. After excruciatingly long viewings of the videos, Doug saw various leaves being blown and bugs flying. However, in his wisdom, Spectate knew his eyes were not to be trusted. Clearly they were not leaves nor bugs, but alien spaceships sent to monitor him with the aid of the big crow that has occaisionally been seen in Doug's garden. Conveniently forgetting the rules of three-dimentional space, Doug thought that their apparent proximity in his videos indicated that they were in cahoots against him. Despite the shame of being ridiculed even on forums devoted to UFOs and alien sightings, Spectate has sought to warn the public about the alien threat. Should you have the stomach for more, please see the 'Aliens' page.
NOTE: i havent been here for a while, so sorry if it is out of date already. if you have ideas but dont want to do it yourself, just shout. Oh and thanks for the credit :) but i do it for the love of the mockery. :P
-
Double Jammin IT with SSDS
@jakkle said:
That's a pretty good story. Way better than I could have put it. A few points I'd disagree on but good.sorry ive been gone so long [FUCKING gcse-s (no i havent been fucking exams, im just annoyed at having to work)], and i finally worked up enough courage to think about swamp's teachings again. apologies again for the wait, just tack this on the end:
Suffering from suspected psychoses too numerous to name, SpectateSwamp has the obsession that the entire world is out to get him. 'Geeks' are conspiring to suppress his 'search engine' and make him lose coding competitions, and many even challenge his magic stones! It is really impossible to do justice in summary to the wide, scary range of Doug's paranoia, so for a more detailed analysis of his conspiracy theories, visit the 'Conspiracies' page.
As well as his digital obsessions, Doug is an avid amateur paleontologist who combes the riverbanks near his home in an attempt to find fossils. An interesting endeavour which many of us have tried at some point, but Spectate takes it one step further. Not content with the skeletons of dead fish, he honestly believes that he found some real life dinosaur skin. Apparantly ignorant of the fact that this is impossible except in marshes and tar pits, Doug 'strengthened' his claims with many blurry photos which to most looked like nothing more than a rock. As may well be expected, he ignored all criticisms against him, claiming conspiracies by local museums who, the thought, wanted to poach his finds. Most critics believe they would not want to poach it at all - if the museum wanted a bit of useless and uninteresting rock, they could go and find one themselves - as Spectate himself did. Apparantly historical delusions are somewhat a problem in Doug's neighbourhood, as one of Spectate's 'friends' believes he found a huge skeleton at the river. Frighteningly, this unnamed friend also believed in a conspiracy against him, and, like Doug, was totally unable to take a photograph that was in focus, even with today's digital camera technology. If you want more detail, please see the 'Dinosaur Skin' section.
Clearly discontented with his earthly conspiracies, Spectate sought to branch out and soon came across what he thought were aliens in some of his pointless videos of clouds. After excruciatingly long viewings of the videos, Doug saw various leaves being blown and bugs flying. However, in his wisdom, Spectate knew his eyes were not to be trusted. Clearly they were not leaves nor bugs, but alien spaceships sent to monitor him with the aid of the big crow that has occaisionally been seen in Doug's garden. Conveniently forgetting the rules of three-dimentional space, Doug thought that their apparent proximity in his videos indicated that they were in cahoots against him. Despite the shame of being ridiculed even on forums devoted to UFOs and alien sightings, Spectate has sought to warn the public about the alien threat. Should you have the stomach for more, please see the 'Aliens' page.
NOTE: i havent been here for a while, so sorry if it is out of date already. if you have ideas but dont want to do it yourself, just shout. Oh and thanks for the credit :) but i do it for the love of the mockery. :P
The large fishhead stone is so big that It wouldn't have moved far. That picture is the worst I've seen to. Just a tiny bit better than nothing.
The Dolphins in the bank story. Was from 40 years back. I went with my friend looking for the spot. He wasn't sure if it was upstream or down. But either way there are only so many banks to check. If there were 2 Dino Mummies there could have been more. Maybe new ones are exposed now. Seems everything that died around here got mummified. Dino Mummy central is my backyard. Of course the Aliens would want to check it out. Learn my secret dino skin site.
Crazy. If you want people to think your are crazy. Wander around in the back alley with your camcorder in a tripod videoing clouds and muttering times and dates to the camera. Probably even right now some of my swampies are looking at their fresh cloud videos in super slow motion searching for aliens. That's how you Hunt and capture Aliens - with Swamp Search
I just finished downloading VB.net I'm sure I can program in VB.net just as badly as VB5.0 Geez me taking advice and not giving it. Looks like it's time for SpectateSwamp to move on and find another group to bug.
For my VB build I'll have SSDS run a control file of edits on the original Source.txt file. Making all the changes that are required that way. Comment out the stuff that doesn't work and work on it later. If the progress isn't that good. I'll look at another language. I'll make changes to the VB5.0 version. then process the VB.net edits and Jam the both of them. That should be fun.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Wander around in the back alley with your camcorder in a tripod
What!? You have a tripod? All this time you've been making totally crappy hand-held reshoots of your stupid videos, and you could've used a tripod? Just how stupidly moronic are you?
@SpectateSwamp said:
Looks like it's time for SpectateSwamp to move on and find another group to bug.
Oh, would you, pretty please with sprinkles on top? We'd be ever so appreciative.
-
Damn does that meanyou wont be fixing the SSDS starts up bug? Please fix it!
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Crazy. If you want people to think your are crazy. Wander around in the back alley with your camcorder in a tripod videoing clouds and muttering times and dates to the camera. Probably even right now some of my swampies are looking at their fresh cloud videos in super slow motion searching for aliens. That's how you Hunt and capture Aliens - with Swamp Search
Dude, have you ever been diagnosed with schizophrenia? Because you fit the description to a T.
@SpectateSwamp said:
I just finished downloading VB.net I'm sure I can program in VB.net just as badly as VB5.0
I am confident in your ability to program in any language just as badly as you have in VB5. You just have to put your mind to it.
@SpectateSwamp said:
That should be fun.
Honestly, as batshit crazy as you are, I'm glad you are still enjoying your life. That's probably the most important thing in the world and nobody can take that away from you.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Seems everything that died around here got mummified.
Perhaps the Ancient Egyptians had dinos as pets? (Or more likely, there used to be a Goa'uld outpost in Canada)
