Eval()?
-
true, but we'd better make the trilions by selling the ide, because the important truth of the matter is that there is a fatal flaw in the idea. a flaw so gret that it could plunge the entire universe into a pandimensional war!
a flaw so terrible that i shall take the secret of it to my grave and e'en unto the gates of hell itself and beyond shall i keep the secret!
-
I don't know, like I've said before, where I work,
{
and}
are used for 'contains' and 'not contains' respectively. For strings.
-
That's okay, I will just find the secret in the noise
-
Don't forget to check it for the lost chord, as well. You may need a few different audio codecs for that.
-
The audio codecs are programmed in right before the audio itself! How convenient!
Also, shutup Discourse, you're not my DiscoMom
-
-
I love an optimist
oh, like i'm bound for anywhere else?
Oh i might get lucky and get misplaced into sto-vo-kor, but that's the best i can hope for at this point. there's no way i'm getting into the fields of elysium (and good! bloody boring place to spend eternity that)
-
Discussion:
You can use the DataTable.Compute method in C# as a kind of psuedo-Eval(). It's insane.
-
Anyone that isn't writing an interpreter/compiler in the language that is to be interpreted is Doing It WrongTM.
-
At least it seems pretty limited
-
Yeah it pretty much just does math and aggregations. Still though.
-
That's okay, I will just find the secret in the noise
That's simple: it can be found between the notes (for music and such); in the voids of the echoes of standing waves; and just below the null point at crossover.
-
It's like a cute little baby Excel, all wrapped up in a beautiful programming language, awwwww
in the voids of the echoes of standing waves
head asplodes
-
oh, like i'm bound for anywhere else?
purgatory? :)
If I understand things correctly, there are no vices in heaven. I'm not sure I want to spend the rest of eternity there. Besides, up, down or in the middle; come the last trump we will all be "gathered up" anyway.
-
@Eldelshell said:
At the time, Netscape was planning to produce a version of Netscape Navigator written fully in Java
In 1997, wow, that would have been incredibly stupid. Running the rendering engine entirely on top of already slow-at-the-time java? On machines from 97? That would have been a legendarily slow and bad web browser
so...... they were trying to invent disourse?
-
Let it be known, in 1997, even Netscape was smart enough to not reinvent the wheel
something something history something something repeat it
-
there are no vices in heaven.
blech. vices (in moderation) are what make life FUN!
besides there are soooooo many more afterlifes than just heaven/purgatory/hell.
and good thing too. heaven is bland, purgatory literally nothing happens (or is that limbo?) and hell is for M's only (and possibly S's too depending on what side they are on)
the afterlifes of other mythologies are far more interesting!
-
That would have been a legendarily slow and bad web browser
But on the plus side, you would not have noticed because of download speed.
-
the afterlifes of other mythologies are far more interesting!
Please, please please don't let it be reincarnation :)
-
well if it is reincarnation at least it will be more interesting than an eternity without any vices, or any instrument other than harp and "celestial spheres" whatever they are....
-
heaven is bland
As far as I know, no one knows what'll actually happen there, so I don't know that such finality is called for.
purgatory literally nothing happens (or is that limbo?)
Catholics are weird. They come up with stuff like this all the time.
hell is for M's only (and possibly S's too depending on what side they are on)
I don't know, I feel like an M would be pampered.
-
celestial spheres
I think they get removed on entry.
Also, I was going to ask if reincarnation is the chosen path (and there are at least two schools of thought about "sequence"): What were we before we were human? and is human => fox achievable. (because I thought you might take that opportunity if given the chance)
-
-
-
Frequently paired with 'BD', an & sign, and/or lots of leather.
-
I cannot unlearn that
-
Success!
-
Does Java even have an Eval() analogue? Maybe you could do something with running the compiler and using reflection or whatever to pull in the resulting class file? My "advanced" java experience isn't exactly, well, advanced
Not reflection, just spin up a new ClassLoader to load the resultant files.
-
Frequently paired with 'BD', an & sign, and/or lots of leather.
whips, chains and latex often feature as well, but are by no means required.
-
-
Ahh yeah that's what I meant, hence the "Hurr Durr I no Java good"
Now we just need a class designed to compile, and we've got ourselves a project!
-
but are by no means required.
They aren't. And here was me thinking M sees S with whip / chain / latex gimp suit. M thinks oh goody. S thinks your pain shall not be having your pleasure.
But I suppose, as anticipation is 90% of the pleasure, not having them there to anticipate would be the greater pain.
Or is it?
-
that too. also the rubber kind
-
-
New entry for the discopeadia.
Latex: A slow SMS update / notification service.
-
Oh, thank you
-
No order of M,S,BD,& produces anything in google search.
-
@loose said:
I cannot unlearn that
I approve of this ruination of innocence.
My job here is done....
/me adds a tally mark to her whiteboard that's already almost full of tally marks
-
You actually tried?
-
uncouple the B and the D
[spoiler]B S D M[/spoiler]
-
-
-
-
-
....... please leave the poor database alone.... he's just trying to do his job.
-
Dynamic SQL...It's still spiteful...
This metaphor made me giggle a little bit.
Filed Under: PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES DON'T HAVE MOTIVES
-
Yahoo Search is actively subverting my attempts to insinuate euphemisms.
-
PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES DON'T HAVE MOTIVES
BUT THEY HAVE FEELINGS. STOP MICROAGRESSION TODAY.
-
-
I did write this once though, but it's never been used in production:
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------ // A simple factory function to allow construction of objects from Types which // are specified in data. Uses `eval` to build an expression of the form // `new Name()` , so // // Usage: // var Factory = require('modules/factory').Factory; // var factory = new Factory({ Array: Array }); // var a = factory.create('Array', 10, 20, 30); // -> a = new Array(10, 20, 30) // -> a = [10, 20, 30] module.exports.Factory = makeclass({ $: function(lookup) { this.lookup = lookup || {}; }, create: function(name) { var _Class_, args, result; try { _Class_ = this.lookup[name]; if(!this.lookup[name]) { this.lookup[name] = _Class_; } } catch(e) { console.log('ERROR: failed to eval "' + name + '"'); } if(_Class_) { // Any remaining arguments are passed as arguments to the constructor by // conversion into a JSON array and trimming off the outer `[` and `]` args = JSON.stringify( Array.prototype.splice.call(arguments, 1) ).slice(1, -1); /*jslint evil: true*/ result = eval('new _Class_(' + args + ')'); /*jslint evil: false*/ } return result; } });