Paste copied image with alt tag causes image to post twice
-
and One from here rather than GIS
Chrome (Chromebook Pixel 2), no special steps just right click, copy image, paste into editor.
weird.
-
CNR. Chrome on Windows. Yes, I copied the first image in each pair.
-
…how? CNR!
-
hmm..... that's odd.
nope. still repro. GIS'd "magic" right clicked on image, copy image, paste here. got it twice.
interestingly look at raw.
-
…nope, still CNR
-
-
Nope
-
-
Nope. WAit, I didn't get an alt tag? I copied from GIS
-
oh FFS it's specific to Chrome on ChromeOS, or maybe linux.
this post is on a windows 8.1 computer in chrome.
-
Still no alt tag, and I copied the thumbnail this time. How did you get an alt tag generated?
Copy image url maybe?
No...
-
Linux Chrome:
-
Nope. Not Linux either.
-
-
-
apparently not enough?
Chrome version stats for what they're worth:
Version 42.0.2311.153 (64-bit)
Platform 6812.88.0 (Official Build) stable-channel samus
Firmware Google_Samus.6300.103.0
-
What, without Windows underneath? I'm not sure you understand just how much Windows does.
-
I… wait, what?
-
What, without Windows underneath? I'm not sure you understand just how much Windows does.
Qué?
-
Wow, all my jokes fall flat lately.
I was referencing an old copypasta, I'm pretty sure I originally saw it here on the old forums: https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/402257-Linux-can-t-run-on-PC-without-Windows-underneath
ETA: I was right: http://forums.thedailywtf.com/forums/p/7657/142433.aspx
Are you saying that this linux can run on a computer without windows underneath it, at all ? As in, without a boot disk, without any drivers, and without any services ?
That sounds preposterous to me.
If it were true (and I doubt it), then companies would be selling computers without a windows. This clearly is not happening, so there must be some error in your calculations. I hope you realise that windows is more than just Office ? Its a whole system that runs the computer from start to finish, and that is a very difficult thing to acheive. A lot of people dont realise this.
Microsoft just spent $9 billion and many years to create Vista, so it does not sound reasonable that some new alternative could just snap into existence overnight like that. It would take billions of dollars and a massive effort to achieve. IBM tried, and spent a huge amount of money developing OS/2 but could never keep up with Windows. Apple tried to create their own system for years, but finally gave up recently and moved to Intel and Microsoft.
Its just not possible that a freeware like the Linux could be extended to the point where it runs the entire computer fron start to finish, without using some of the more critical parts of windows. Not possible.
I think you need to re-examine your assumptions.
-
I got it, I got it!!!
-
Is the Image encoded in the Base 64? I think it is. Cool. (it's both in the Base 64 and In the link). I've seen this done before, also set in the css.
-
-
Ugh, but that's upstairs.
Edit: I've seen it before if my memory serves correctly. Samsung ARM dhromebook. Codename Daisy.
-
-
-
Yup, you can do that. You rarely see it; it's seems like it would be useful for small images such as icons, but transferring it like that means you can't cache the resource, so you end up spending way more bandwidth.
-
Opera on Linux, all fine.
Though that should be Chrome 43 by now? Maybe it's a Chrome 42 thing?
EDIT: Scratch that, repo done fucked me over, I'm on older Opera, Chrome 42 equivalent.
-
that appears to be a confirmation.
weird.