Downpix.com
-
-
Looks like it still existed back in June: http://web.archive.org/web/20140625103101/http://uppix.com/
-
Wow, it's still down? It was live this week! I posted because I thought it was somebody's slight fail and expected it up in hours.
If they lost everything ever uploaded there... wow, some people will be pissed.
-
TRWTF: FILE_NOT_FOUND
Filed under: Bonus toaster: Body invalid, be more descriptive
-
We had an
.htaccessboo-boo recently too.Junior frontend guy pushed into the full-stack role had placed admin password in
config.iniand had no idea he should have secured it. I was too busy and didn't think to check. The hacker kid who discovered it went directly to the client. Ooops.
-
If they lost everything ever uploaded there... wow, some people will be pissed.
Remind me again how it's stupid for Discourse to be downloading every image you link to?
...
...
...
Oh, right, the disk space.
-
All software should break civil law by default, obviously.
EDIT: oh hey the forum's broken. Yay. Well maybe you'll see this snark and maybe not, who fucking knows.
-
Wow, this is bad.
-
Remind me again how it's stupid for Discourse to be downloading every image you link to?
Because Internet Lawyers know this is WRONG and will SUE you for COPYWRITE!!
Filed under: What DMCA 230 "safe harbor"?, we need a new tag cloud to attack, DiscoSearch
Man failoeag is a complete nutjob...
-
Because Internet Lawyers know this is WRONG and will SUE you for COPYWRITE!!
I'm just waiting for someone to discover copywrite's alterego copyread....
-
Remind me again how it's stupid for Discourse to be downloading every image you link to?
I'd screenshot the log of the change with DiscoBools, but the log only goes back to Oct 22...
Here is is from previous anyway:
-
Yeah, I know it's disabled. Because it takes up so much space.
The original reasoning behind it (avoiding link rot (see: Photobucket)) is nice, but...
-
Because it takes up so much space.
No - that wasn't the reason. Can't quite remember the exact reason, but space certainly wasn't it.
-
Copyright i think was why. EU laws on that are like super strict.
-
Wasn't it because it was making the backups too big and they would end up corrupt on the Amazon S3 instance?
-
Copyright i think was why. EU laws on that are like super strict.
It was that thread of thought that prompted it I think..
Wasn't it because it was making the backups too big and they would end up corrupt on the Amazon S3 instance?
No - the corruption was trying to download from what.thedailywtf.com directly. I separately verified with Alex that the backups uploaded to Amazon were fine.
