Down for me or everybody? people.live.com
-
Trying to do people.live.com to IM some peoples, found it's been unable to connect all day. Just me? Or is it fine for everybody else?
I fear the network filter guys here might have blocked it over the weekend.
EDIT: note, the webpage loads, it just fails to connect to the IM service.
-
Someone should create a website that will check this type of thing for you.
-
They could name it http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ to make it easy to find.
-
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ can not log into a microsoft account and see if something works on a site.
-
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ can not log into a microsoft account and see if something works on a site.
Neither can I, so we're even. Fucking "suspicious login" things.
-
I can't log in because the only microsoft-related account I have is a Skype account.
-
Hey idiots, I covered that in the OP.
-
Hey idiot, you covered it in the edit that came in after I said what I did.
You should learn to read.
I do not respond to pedantic dickweedery.
I hate open source.
Windows is the best.
All other languages than C# suck.
I am the greatest and no one else's opinion is valid.
-
You all are useless to me.
-
@Intercourse said:
Hey idiot, you covered it in the edit that came in after I said what I did.
You should learn to read.
I do not respond to pedantic dickweedery.
I hate open source.
Windows is the best.
All other languages than C# suck.
I am the greatest and no one else's opinion is valid.
I saw this topic about 6 minutes after the OP. At the time, @blakeyrat's edit was visible, but no edit symbol was shown on his post. This indicates it was a ninja edit, so added within the first minute.
At that time, posts by you and @chubertdev were 1 minute old, so about 5 minutes after the topic was created, at most 4 minutes after the ninja edit. If you didn't see his edit, it was your own damn fault.
You all are useless to me.
And proudly so.
-
If you didn't see his edit, it was your own damn fault.
Or Discourse added it in after the fact with its AJAX'y magicness?
-
@Intercourse said:
Or Discourse added it in after the fact with its AJAX'y magicness?
It doesn't usually take Dicsores's AJAX'y magicness five minutes to update the DOM, but it's Dicsores, so maybe. I gotta say, though, the odds favor @blakeyrat on this.
-
-
Likewise.
-
-
He is an attention whore, it is to be expected.
-
@Intercourse said:
He is an attention whore, it is to be expected.
A guy decides to go hunting. He buys a rifle, heads out into the woods, sees a bear. He shoots at the bear, and misses, and it chases him, catches him, pulls down his pants, and fucks him in the ass. The guy gets furious, so the next day, he comes back to the woods, sees the bear, and shoots at it again. For a second time, he misses, and the bear chases and catches him, and then fucks him in the ass again. Now the guy's really mad, swears he's gonna get that bear, and the third day, heads out into the woods, sees, shoots at, and misses the bear again. The bear chases him, catches him, pulls down his pants, and says "you're not here for the hunting, are you?"
-
replace "the guy" with @algorythmics