WTF Domains
-
".wtf is a gTLD that was proposed in ICANN's New gTLD Program. The applicant and now Registry Operator is Donuts (Hidden Way, LLC).[1] Their application succeeded and was delegated to the Root Zone on 23 April 2014."
Have we signed up for this yet?
-
And if not, why not?
-
I agree with whatever @Arantor just said!
-
Curse on this world for not having a country named Waterfallia. We could have gotten this years ago.
-
I'll give out a like to the person who registers discourseisa.wtf.
Filed under: Bustin' out the big prizes.
-
daily.wtf would be awesome
make it happen
-
I'll give out a like to the person who registers tr.wtf so we can have tr.wtf/is/whatever and whatever.is.tr.wtf.
-
daily.wtf
tr.wtf
Both seem to be unavailable. I hope they went to a good home.
-
Also thedaily.wtf. I hope Alex got that one at least.
-
https://whois.donuts.co/Index.aspx
daily.wtf is reserved by this guy:
Registrant ID: mfc3794375_dxfa Registrant Name: Markus Fuchs-Winkler Registrant Organization: Registrant Street: Königsberg 18 Registrant City: Aspang Registrant State/Province: Registrant Postal Code: 2870 Registrant Country: AT Registrant Phone: +43.6503250114 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: markus@servernetwork.at
No info on the other ones.
-
Well, none of them are in use, so they're clearly domain-squatting. Maybe Alex can buy one of them out.
-
Nah, Alex is taking the .phb domains.
-
How dedicated are you?
-
Not that dedicated.
-
Perfect. Doesn't even need content. Just dump a visit counter on it and it's done!
Filed under: Preferably looking like a scanned piece of paper on a wooden table
-
I was thinking of just forwarding with masking to meta.discourse.org.
-
Reasonable.
Mine would be more meta (more meta than meta! ha! oh, I crack myself up sometimes...). Could do with "... people think Discourse is WTF" though.
Hey! Let's combine them! Counter on the top, meta.d in an iframe below!
-
iframes are a bit before my time so perhaps I'm making incorrect buttumptions on what they are, but what happens if you load an InfiniScroll site up in an iframe with the height set to something ridiculously large?
-
What happens when you shove infinity into a max sized box?
Same concept applies.
-
but what happens if you load an InfiniScroll site up in an iframe with the height set to something ridiculously large?
*giggles*
Sublime Text, buddy, it's time to dance.
Brb.
-
iframes are a bit before my time
"Before your time"? iframes are on like 75% of websites right now this instant.
-
Nono, web 2.0 dictates a 1x1 image instead of a 1x1 iframe.
So it's like 47.3%, tops.
-
"Before your time"? iframes are on like 75% of websites right now this instant.
I've never used an iframe on anything I've built before...always thought they got swept up in that "Tables are bad, mkay?" paradigm.
-
Refused to display 'https://meta.discourse.org/' in a frame because it set 'X-Frame-Options' to 'SAMEORIGIN'.
BASTARDS!
-
You've never built a website with an embedded YouTube movie? That's one obvious application of iframes.
They're also used for virtually all double-redirection ad serving.
EDIT: while fixing the typo, I got this exciting and visually-appealing load spinner:
Fortunately I had plenty of time to screenshot as it stayed on screen forever. I had to hit refresh.
EDIT: And yes, the toolbar list buttons do look that fucking terrible on my screen while editing a post. I'm at 100% zoom in a stock Chrome.
-
-
Probably. After dinner. Earlier if someone else tries.
-
To be fair I've never done a standard website, they've always been enterprisey applications, with no ads.
-
I think I was confusing frames with iframes.
-
-
BASTARDS
Just write a script to fetch and cache the content of the site. That sort of thing is fine apparently.
-
-
EDIT: And yes, the toolbar list buttons do look that fucking terrible on my screen while editing a post. I'm at 100% zoom in a stock Chrome.
They appear the same in IE11
I imaging they started out as vectors, but then weren't optimised once scaled down
-
I imaging they started out as vectors, but then weren't optimised once scaled down
They were optimized all right. Optimized to fuck with my eyes and check if I have my glasses on that is.
-
started out as vectors
Well, they are vectors unless something major changed about how fonts work.
-
cough https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixed_(typeface) cough
-
Not the fonts, the list (ordered and unordered) buttons... Unless you're suggesting those are characters and those are fucking up
-
Can't reproduce.
-
Just added this to my custom stylesheet, makes it look better to me:
.wmd-button { font-size:14px; }
Yes, they are "characters" in the "FontAwesome" font.
And since we're here, here's also the change I did to make the hamburger menu at the top look better:
.d-header .icons [class^="fa fa-"] { font-size: 21px; }
-
Not the fonts, the list (ordered and unordered) buttons... Unless you're suggesting those are characters and those are fucking up
That is exactly the case. Bulleted list is \f0ca and numbered list is \f0cb.
-
Yes, they are "characters" in the "FontAwesome" font.
Oh well that was a good engineering decision. Not only is it much simpler to implement than an image, it doesn't at all look like refried ass when scaled.
Now which character code in "FontAwesome" is the sarcasm marker?
-
‽ But sadly not in FA.
-
No, that's an interrobang⸮
-
Yes, and we agreed a while ago that we would use that to indicate sarcasm.
-
Just added this to my custom stylesheet, makes it look better to me:
.wmd-button { font-size:14px; }
Yes, they are "characters" in the "FontAwesome" font.
And since we're here, here's also the change I did to make the hamburger menu at the top look better:
.d-header .icons [class^="fa fa-"] { font-size: 21px; } ```</blockquote> There's a WMD button?
-
-
There's a WMD button?
We're repeatedly assured that there is, but our invading forces have yet to find them
-
<input type="button" id="WMD" knowns="unknown" unknowns="unknown" />
-
#Barack Obama orders airstrike on HTMLInputElement just days after sending aid.