Is HE testing "for" or "switch" ?

[boga_alexa]

for (int t = 0; t < 4; t++)
{
switch (t)
{
case 0:
title = cb.getR1Type();
value = qb.getR1();
break;
case 1:
title = cb.getR2Type();
value = qb.getR2();
break;
case 2:
title = cb.getR3Type();
value = qb.getR3();
break;
case 3:
title = cb.getR4Type();
value = qb.getR4();
break;
default:
throw new Exception("Program Error in switch: sendEmail");
}
if (title.trim().length() > 0)
{
j.append('\t');
j.append(title);
j.append(":\t");
j.append(value);
j.append('\n');
}
}

[boga_alexa]

Sorry, the message was truncated while posting, please disregard.

[boga_alexa]

Re: Is HE testing "for" or "switch" ? - finally

for (int t = 0; t < 4; t++) {
                switch (t) {
                    case 0:
                        title = cb.getR1Type();
                        value = qb.getR1();
                        break;
                    case 1:
                        title = cb.getR2Type();
                        value = qb.getR2();
                        break;
                    case 2:
                        title = cb.getR3Type();
                        value = qb.getR3();
                        break;
                    case 3:
                        title = cb.getR4Type();
                        value = qb.getR4();
                        break;
                    default:
                        throw new Exception("Program Error in switch: sendEmail");
                }    
                if (title.trim().length() > 0)
                {    
                    j.append('\t');
                    j.append(title);
                    j.append(":\t");
                    j.append(value);
                    j.append('\n');
                }
            }

[Vlad_the_Impaler]

  Maybe the developer in question was getting payed by the number of lines of code he wrote :) and come to think of it he  found quite an ingenious solution for writing this piece of code which actually could have been done in a few lines :)).

The "Specialists Hall of Fame" deserves one more entry next to the Quadrasort developer :))


Have fun!

[Joost_]

The FOR-CASE paradigm never ceases to amaze.