Nicely done tdwtf

haha_only_serious

[img]http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/7023/tdwtffail1.png[/img]
[img]http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/4094/tdwtffail2.png[/img]

same problem in firefox.

Shinhan

Check the source. Everything is in <noscript> so if you turn on NoScript you'll see the normal page. Interesting joke :)

To look at the source, the rest of the page is there, but at a glance there's nothing odd...

Something interesting happens if you click "Display: Full Articles" at top ... you get the same first line followed by a completely different article... again looking at the source, the correct article is there (twice!) yet not displayed ... then the mysterious second article.

haha_only_serious

lol, I see, so the jokes on me. Very nicely done indeed.

@Shinhan said:

Check the source. Everything is in <noscript> so if you turn on NoScript you'll see the normal page. Interesting joke :)

aha! Glanced right over that; thanks!

Lorne Kates

@Shinhan said:

Check the source. Everything is in <noscript> so if you turn on NoScript you'll see the normal page. Interesting joke :)

I see nothing of the sort. (Now that I fixed the noscript tag). Turns out "Summary" + <noscript> = wtf.

fatbull

@Shinhan said:

Check the source. Everything is in <noscript> so if you turn on NoScript you'll see the normal page. Interesting joke :)

I wonder how the forum handles <noscript> noscript tags. Or .

Edit: It removed the tag. Could have been worse.

fatbull

Addendum: Apparently, the U+0001 character broke the RSS feed. I can no longer edit my previous post, however, so I can't fix it.

nexekho1

And I thought it was just me. On Opera the menu ends up all the way over on the right at the bottom.

Lorne Kates

@nexekho said:

And I thought it was just me. On Opera the menu ends up all the way over on the right at the bottom.

Nice try. I almost fell for it.

Like there's more than one browser in existence. Ha.

The_Assimilator

@Lorne Kates said:

@nexekho said:
And I thought it was just me. On Opera the menu ends up all the way over on the right at the bottom.

Nice try. I almost fell for it.
Like there's more than one browser in existence. Ha.

Same issue with FF 3.6.12...

Lorne Kates

@The_Assimilator said:

@Lorne Kates said:
@nexekho said:
And I thought it was just me. On Opera the menu ends up all the way over on the right at the bottom.

Nice try. I almost fell for it.
Like there's more than one browser in existence. Ha.

Same issue with FF 3.6.12...

Did you try the native browser in Palm OS4?

wrack

@Lorne Kates said:

@The_Assimilator said:
@Lorne Kates said:
@nexekho said:
And I thought it was just me. On Opera the menu ends up all the way over on the right at the bottom.

Nice try. I almost fell for it.
Like there's more than one browser in existence. Ha.

Same issue with FF 3.6.12...

Did you try the native browser in Palm OS4?

As far as I remember, OS4 did not have a native browser.
At least, not 4.0 on the 500-series. The 700-series were Web enabled, IIRC, but weren't they running 4.2?

Oh yeah, there were the "Palm Query Apps" on Palm VII series... they used in'net, I think, but you needed a separate program to retrieve a specific bit of data and display it. At least, that's how I always understood this worked.

Lorne Kates

@bannedfromcoding said:

As far as I remember, OS4 did not have a native browser.
At least, not 4.0 on the 500-series. The 700-series were Web enabled, IIRC, but weren't they running 4.2?

Oh yeah, there were the "Palm Query Apps" on Palm VII series... they used in'net, I think, but you needed a separate program to retrieve a specific bit of data and display it. At least, that's how I always understood this worked.

Did you try editing the article, removing all the <div> tags, adding some weird whitespace, then hope&pray the main page's "summary" view doesn't choke on it's own digestive enzymes?

wrack

Actually, I missed the joke article altogether.

ender

I just thought that the SQL server was giving problems again (especially since clicking the Full articles link showed one part of the article, and clicking the headline showed another). Never bothered looking at the source (which I probably would do if it was any other site).