A Brief Definition



  • Not a technical or computer WTF, but I still found it amusing.  I thought to look up the definition of sardonic on wikipedia.  Wow, now I know exactly what it means!

     Definition of Sardonic

    (If you're curious, I think sardonic is like sarcastic, but without the humor.)



  • This might be more what you're looking for...



  • Or perhaps this.



  • I don't understand. Were you redirected to this definition when you tried to find sardonic?



  •  This is pretty standard for dictionaries. Why do they need to redefine a root word every time you add a prefix or suffix? It's annoying, yes, but it's typical.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sardonicism



  • Quick, someone change the definition of sardonic to "in a manner containing sardonicism"!



  • @bobzilla said:

     This is pretty standard for dictionaries. Why do they need to redefine a root word every time you add a prefix or suffix? It's annoying, yes, but it's typical.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sardonicism

    I don't see your problem with it. There's no way of knowing if a word is one which has a root or not. If you don't know what it means - which is presumably why you're looking it up in a dictionary - how can you tell whether words like 'solecism', 'dissent', 'unity' and so-on are derivatives or unique formations that coincidentally resemble pre- and suffixes.



  • @davedavenotdavemaybedave said:

    'solecism', 'dissent', 'unity'
     

    Sol and dis I get, but un is a prefix! You're just makity-ing up wordities!



  • So are sol- and dis-?



  • I see this all the time in dictionaries. Generates more page views. From Wiktionary (you didn't actually mean Wikipedia?) that is a bit surprising though...



  • @davedavenotdavemaybedave said:

    There's no way of knowing if a word is one which has a root or not.
     

    In the example it says the etymology is "sardonic + ism" which does give you the root of the word. 

    Most half-decent dictionaries have instructions at the front on how to use them.



  • @lolwtf said:

    I see this all the time in dictionaries. Generates more page views. From Wiktionary (you didn't actually mean Wikipedia?) that is a bit surprising though...
    Not sure if you knew this or not, but Wiktionary is a siter project of Wikipedia. There's like 15+ wikis related to Wikipedia (because having them all in one site is a bad thing apparently)



  • @davedavenotdavemaybedave said:

    @bobzilla said:

     This is pretty standard for dictionaries. Why do they need to redefine a root word every time you add a prefix or suffix? It's annoying, yes, but it's typical.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sardonicism

    I don't see your problem with it. There's no way of knowing if a word is one which has a root or not. If you don't know what it means - which is presumably why you're looking it up in a dictionary - how can you tell whether words like 'solecism', 'dissent', 'unity' and so-on are derivatives or unique formations that coincidentally resemble pre- and suffixes.
     

    Clearly dissent (dis-sent) means to refuse to send something.  For example, if I refuse to mail a letter to my mother if she's too lazy to use the phone or email..

    solecism (sol-ec-ism) is the study of ec in our planetary system.

    unity (un-ity) is the opposite of ity.  One assumes this applies to all types of ity and not just the more common types like city (c-ity).



  • @powerlord said:

    solecism (sol-ec-ism) is the study of ec in our planetary system.
     

    Bullshit.

    solecism is the sociopolitical conviction of solar Ec.



  •  @dhromed said:

    @powerlord said:

    solecism (sol-ec-ism) is the study of ec in our planetary system.
     

    Bullshit.

    solecism is the sociopolitical conviction of solar Ec.

     You're right, I was thinking solecology for some reason.  I blame lack of coffee yesterday.



  • Where did that mug go?  Did I already give it to you?



  • @DCRoss said:

    Or perhaps this.


    Anyone else notice that the results change a bit if you, er, "recurse" it a dozen times or so?



  • @joemck said:

    @DCRoss said:

    Or perhaps this.

    Anyone else notice that the results change a bit if you, er, "recurse" it a dozen times or so?

    Is that a troll? Because if so, well done.  I clicked 30-ish times and no changes happened. :(



  • @Sutherlands said:

    @joemck said:

    @DCRoss said:

    Or perhaps this.

    Anyone else notice that the results change a bit if you, er, "recurse" it a dozen times or so?

    Is that a troll? Because if so, well done.  I clicked 30-ish times and no changes happened. :(

    Google uses Map-Reduce. The results depend on whatever the first X servers happened to return... it's not guaranteed to be an identical resultset every time.



  • @dhromed said:

    solecism is the sociopolitical conviction of solar Ec.

    You're both wrong.

    sole·c·ism (/səʊl·si:·ɪzəm/)

    1. A group of any social and political philosophies, whose -ism contains a single C. The original term referred specifically to communism, masochism and careerism.
    2. Criticism of a musical work that lacks variety.
    3. The act of describing a whole group as posessing the same (often negative) trait, despite it only being true for certain members of the group.



  • @Faxmachinen said:

    You're both wrong.

    sole·c·ism (/səʊl·si:·ɪzəm/)

    1. A group of any social and political philosophies, whose -ism contains a single C. The original term referred specifically to communism, masochism and careerism.
    2. Criticism of a musical work that lacks variety.
    3. The act of describing a whole group as posessing the same (often negative) trait, despite it only being true for certain members of the group.

     

    +1


Log in to reply