The death of Ruby?
-
@wharrgarbl said in The death of Ruby?:
if you do
.netany high level programming language sooner or later you get pushed into web development.FTFY.
Web is by far the most popular platform, which might have something to do with it
-
@dragnslcr said in The death of Ruby?:
You do have to give the Ruby creators credit - it takes a lot of planning and effort to design a language that's even more unreadable than Perl.
If you think that's unreadable, I have bad news for you:
-
@antiquarian said in The death of Ruby?:
@dragnslcr said in The death of Ruby?:
You do have to give the Ruby creators credit - it takes a lot of planning and effort to design a language that's even more unreadable than Perl.
If you think that's unreadable, I have bad news for you:
https://what.thedailywtf.com/topic/11465/the-bad-ideas-thread/101?u=pjh
-
@captain said in The death of Ruby?:
Winter is coming...
You're saying that the Starks don't use Python?
-
@wharrgarbl said in The death of Ruby?:
Except if you do .net sooner or later you get pushed into web development. That's why I jumped ship to C, because nobody in their right mind does web development with C.
Ooh. I like that excuse! Though C++ in my case...
-
@antiquarian said in The death of Ruby?:
@dragnslcr said in The death of Ruby?:
You do have to give the Ruby creators credit - it takes a lot of planning and effort to design a language that's even more unreadable than Perl.
If you think that's unreadable, I have bad news for you:
And it's Haskell, so it would remain unreadable even if you changed the hieroglyphs with proper names.
-
@anonymous234 :thatsthejoke.md5: